CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes

To: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 20:32:26 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sorry Hans...that is incorrect. Look carefully at any of your recent SS Log Checking Reports (LCR).

Busted call = loss of QSO + 1 penalty QSO.
Not-in-log call = loss of QSO + 1 penalty QSO.
Busted exchange = loss of QSO.

73,
Steve, N2IC
QST/ARRL Web Phone Sweepstakes Author


On 05/25/2013 08:27 AM, Radio K0HB wrote:
Not so, Steve.

If I cobble up your call in SS, I simply lose that Q.  There is no
"encouragement penalty" beyond that.

73, Hans, K0HB

On Friday, May 24, 2013, Steve London wrote:

    On 05/24/2013 01:19 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:

        Kelly,

        The station which makes the "most clean Q's" should win.

        If I make 800 Q's with no errors and you make 805 Q's with 4
        errors (same
        mults), then you beat me 801 to 800.  Unless we played in a socially
        engineered contest like CQWW.


    This may disappoint you Hans, but virtually every major contest is
    "socially engineered" by your definition. Please take your politics
    to a more appropriate, non-ham-radio reflector.

    73,
    Steve, N2IC

        73, Hans, K0HB

    _________________________________________________
    CQ-Contest mailing list
    CQ-Contest@contesting.com
    http://lists.contesting.com/__mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
    <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>



--
73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Sea stories at --------> http://K0HB.wordpress.com
Superstition trails ---> http://OldSlowHans.com



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>