CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy Top Ten Box

To: "'James Hadlock'" <jrhadlock74@msn.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy Top Ten Box
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Reply-to: k5zd@charter.net
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 19:20:34 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
An interesting idea.  What is the accepted definition for calculating
"accuracy"?

Randy, K5ZD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> James Hadlock
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 4:57 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy Top Ten Box
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> From: James Hadlock<mailto:jrhadlock74@msn.com>
> 
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 8:56 AM
> 
> Subject: Accuracy Top Ten Box
> 
> 
> 
> 
> How about contest organizers publish as part of the general results a Top
> Ten box for Accuracy?  We already have individual accuracy reports for
> the major contests - it would open a whole new form of competition.
> 
> 
> 
> Jim  K7WA
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>