| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy Top Ten Box |
| From: | VE5ZX <ve5zx@hotmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:28:13 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
An interesting idea. What is the accepted definition for calculating "accuracy"? (% correct calls + % correct exchanges)/2 ? Syl -VE5ZX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] New Mexico QSO Party, Charles W. Shaw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy Top Ten Box, Dave Hachadorian |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy Top Ten Box, Randy Thompson K5ZD |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy Top Ten Box, Steve Dyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |