Yes W2LC, the movement to station automation lately is the evolution of
real ham radio into another hobby, related but different. When some hams
lost the joy of discovery and happenstance...the essence of ham radio...
they turned the corner into another hobby which unfortunately intrudes on
the essence and destroys it by intermixing the two.
Of course, we few can still practice real ham radio and try to cope with
the new hobby tuning in, but it is still a sad happening to see a real
human joy slowly disappear. Bye bye, Charly
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:19 AM, <w2lc@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
>
> I don't operate assisted. Why? I'm not interested in RBN, skimmer,
> internet spots, etc. Those are cute technologies but of no interest to me.
> I do single-op, mostly one radio, and I balance running with S&P. That's
> why I dislike the non-IDers, I actually S&P.
>
> For WRTC NA2 you must join several multi's if you wish to place near the
> top of the standings. Strictly going single-op won't get you there without
> a Herculean effort.
>
> And if I did go assisted what would I get?
>
> An internet connection that is unreliable and fails on a daily basis.
> Those of you in EU (and you too Randy, and I'm sorry for picking on you,
> well ... a little bit), please understand that there are many areas of the
> US that do not have reliable internet. I am in one of those locations, and
> I am not that far out into the countryside. FIOS? yep they have called me,
> but when they hear where I am, in relation to their service, they say
> "never mind".
>
> I probably will not have truely reliable internet at home in my lifetime.
> Why? Not enough customers in my area to make it economically profitable for
> the internet provider. I am the next to last house on the cable. I'm not
> sure what the next house does. No big deal, that is just the way it is. I
> don't use spots anyway. And the only reason TW ran the cable this far out
> (for a relatively small number of customers) is because one of the town
> board members lives next door, otherwise I guess would have to use my cell
> phone. Ooops my cell service is marginal too, scratch that, but ok for my
> limited use.
>
> The plus side for my locaton is the noise level, I am fortunate to have a
> nearly zero noise level. I would rather have that, than better internet
> service any day.
>
> As for RDXC, I am disqualified even before the start: (kind of, I
> exaggerate)
>
> 11.11 Logs for high scores claiming to be in the top 3 list of any contest
> category (p 3, 3.3) must indicate the frequency of every QSO made (CAT
> system use) with a minimum resolution of 1 kHz.
>
> 11.11.1 An applicant will not be awarded any of the final "Top 3" places
> of any category unless exact frequency of every QSO made is indicated.
>
> So I cannot use RDXC for WRTC qualifying at least not if I place well,
> I'll be DQ'ed for not having exact frequencies in my log ("will not be
> awarded" = "DQ", right?). Didn't someone say that not having exact
> frequencies makes you a cheater? No it doesn't.
>
> I use analog radios, remember those? And they don't have a CAT interface
> so I cannot comply with the frequency rule, unless I manually record
> frequencies. Not gonna do that. I like the radios I am using, they work
> very well. No lectures on older radios please.
>
> Therefore a question for the RDXC contest committee, why would I operate
> your contest when, if I place in the top 3, I will be DQ'ed? Not awarded or
> whatever
>
> I figure to get into the 21st century I need to spend aboout $50,000 USD.
> 2 new radios, 2 new power amplifiers (a couple of those EU 3500W units
> ought to do it, I'll run them conservatively), another tower or two,
> mono-banders, and a house in the Hamptons. A lot of money for maybe a few
> hundred more QSO's.
>
> Maybe, just maybe 2015 will bring a new radio, but which one? I've heard
> so many bad comments on all of the major radio brands, it is difficult to
> choose.
>
> 73 Scott W2LC
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Charly, HS0ZCW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|