Most easy with the busted calls in unassisted logs for example
73
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2014 17:46
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?
Just wondering here, How would the log checkers know?
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 12/12/2014 8:45 AM, K4XS via CQ-Contest wrote:
> Better to ask the log checkers.
>
> However, when I operated from KH6 and had a packet pileup, some well
known
> unassisted guys would show up on a pretty regular basis. Just chance?
> Only they, and the log checkers know for sure.
>
> K4XS
>
>
> In a message dated 12/12/2014 2:41:38 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
> Ktfrog007@aol.com writes:
>
> How widespread is this practice? Everyone talks about it but I've never
> heard any statistics.
>
> Given human nature, I assume the worst, too, but some real data would be
> better.
>
> Everyone talks about alien abductions, too.
>
> 73,
> Ken, AB1J
>
>
> In a message dated 12/12/2014 14:26:38 GMT Standard Time,
> cq-contest@contesting.com writes:
>
> If it wasn't an advantage, why would so many guys
> use it and then claim single op unassisted?
>
> K4XS
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|