CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 40 Meters SSB

To: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>, CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 40 Meters SSB
From: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Reply-to: w1ve@yccc.org
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 10:56:50 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Albert, Extra class hams in mainland USA have a lower band-edge of 7.125
for SSB,. so no issue, unless they are below that frequency (7128 for
safety).
If an op accidentally transmits below 7125 due to a wrong vfo problem, that
is not an issue.  Completing a QSO, big problem.

73, Gerry W1VE





On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr> wrote:

> Many USA stations call me below 7150. They call constantly until I tell
> them they are out of the band and then they usually stop. Sometimes  this
> happens because of the useage of Internet spotting and just using the mouse
> to move the transmitting frequency. Whatever, it is a violation of the
> USA's license.
> I find this practice happening more and more. It is clearly cheating if
> the QSO is claimed for the score . The burden is not on the non USA station
> to know the frequency allocation of the USA station license.
> The software should be progrmmed to catch this nonsense because the logs
> of both stations should reflect the transmitting frequency.
> If the USA station's log does not reflect the correct transmitting
> frequency, then the log should be considered a check log.
> In this age of ham radio software being free or at a very low cost, there
> is no reasonable excuse for not indicating the transmit frequency.
> The few hand written logs that are  submitted should   require the
> transmitting frequency. Anybody submitting a hand written log and cheats
> doing so, well that person is just a nutter.
> If the software can catch this nonsense, and  if it is a patten and not
> just a once or twice mistake, then the log should be DQed.
> 73, Albert, TO5A, 6W1RY, NH7A, etc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>