CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results

To: "'Steve'" <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 21:01:19 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It is so far assisted as the spotting might keep you from qsy to another
band which were probably your intention in that minute.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Steve IK4WMH
Sent: Freitag, 8. Mai 2015 18:59
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results

Hello James,

Tuesday, May 5, 2015, 6:31:33 PM, you wrote:

JC> I see that nearly all the CQ WW CW 2014 SO disqualifications are
JC> for evidence of being "assisted." What is so complicated about
JC> turning off the browser, unplugging the internet connection?

JC> K1TN/4

If I feel like getting on the air for a few hours of contesting
(unlikely to happen these days) I usually play Unassisted but I stay
connected to the local cluster although I keep the spotting window
closed.

The reason is my logging program alerts me when someone spots me while
I am CQing and that keeps me awake during the lower rate hours.

Is that considered "Assistance"? :)



Steve IK4WMH

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>