Then you would say that using a local CW Skimmer is also okay in the
unassisted category because it uses your own antennas and computers and
equipment ?
That has never been allowed in the CQWW rules.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On 05/22/2015 10:23 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
Because that's not "assistance." It's just a different using a
different method to demodulate the signals.
There's no real reason to expand the definition of "assistance" from
using DX clusters and the RBN. My view is that if you are solely
receiving signals using your own antennas and your own computers and
equipment, then you are not "assisted."
73,
Paul, N8HM
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:
On 05/21/2015 11:10 PM, Dick Green WC1M wrote:
Comments on CWWW Rules 2015:
VIII. DEFINITION OF TERMS
2. QSO alerting assistance
The only thing the change does is prohibit
single-frequency CW decoders, which provide no competitive advantage and
may
be needed by ops with hearing problems.
It doesn't "prohibit" single-frequency CW decoders, it just means that use
of a single-frequency CW decoder places you in the Assisted category. What's
so bad about that ?
73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|