CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
From: <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:53 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I am using the same transmitter and receiver and dupe sheet methods that
i developed in 1961 working CD and SS contests. I am not going to change
what i do no matter how you guys change the rules.

mike w7dra


On Sat, 23 May 2015 19:37:20 -0700 Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
writes:
> On Sat,5/23/2015 11:31 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
> > So using a CW Decoder now puts you in the assisted category? I do 
> not see
> > any competitive advantage to using one and it allows less 
> proficient
> > operators to enjoy the contest.
> 
> An operator who can copy CW well is, by definition, more competent 
> in a 
> CW contest than one who cannot.  So I agree that a CW reader is a 
> form 
> of assistance.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

____________________________________________________________
Old School Yearbook Pics
View Class Yearbooks Online Free. Search by School & Year. Look Now!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/55614cb039c124cb00cc8st02vuc
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>