CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 14:13:35 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>


On 05/24/2015 10:04 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
Actually I did think about the dueling CW CQ scenario since I operate RTTY
that way (unassisted). I did not think that CW decoders were anywhere near
as good at copying as the human ear..

They aren't and they don't need to be that good. All they have to do is present a list of plausible callsigns that were decoded. Then they can cross check that list against the SCP database and highlight the probable good callsigns. Just a SMOP.

73,
Steve, N2IC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>