CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs - another statistic

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs - another statistic
From: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:09:00 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi,
different contests, different regions, different outcome. Here is what participants in Worked All Germany Contest used 2013 (scroll to the bottom): http://www.darc.de/referate/dx/contest/wag/en/newsarchives/ - some strong "local content" with i.e. UCX-log. Only gut feeling: WT seems to be widely used by high scoring stations while N1MM seems to be more evenly distributed from category winners, too, to more casual operators. Besides specific requirements for ports or networking I would support the view of "a Pepsi/Coke"-argument and recommend anyone to check a variety of programs. That allows to find the one feeling most reliable and comfortable even at 0430 local time...

Best 73, Chris DL8MBS
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>