CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:53:46 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

"The purpose of the categories is to set a maximum bar (e.g., single vs. many operators, low vs. high power, etc.), not minimum."

EXACTLY!!

Dave   AB7E


On 12/8/2015 3:26 AM, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest wrote:
Not really. Proportionality only makes sense if you are comparing identical 
stations- equipment, skills, teams, etc.  CR3L has demonstrated that you can do 
more with less. In the extreme example, a SOAB station can qualify as M/M.

The purpose of the categories is to set a maximum bar (e.g., single vs. many 
operators, low vs. high power, etc.), not minimum.

Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate 
autocorrect.


On Dec 8, 2015, at 5:17 AM, Jorge Diez CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com> wrote:

GM!

They thing is that they choose a category BECAUSE they saw other scores

If 3830 doesn't exist, what do you think, they will be M2 or MM?

If all have a PROPORTIONAL, if all is "normal", MM will do more points than M2 
and M2 more points than MS, so if you did MS you will not send as M2 or MM, only if you 
see others scores and accommodate you category to win

And if this is Ok, well, we are very bad

73,
Jorge



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>