All,
Key clicks and GJ0KE were indeed annoying this contest. But what drove me
nuts, and I am surprised not to be reading it from others yet, was the "No ID
while running" situation. ***It has gotten much worse***. The practice seems
to be most evident in SA and the Caribbean.
I heard *many* stations not IDing for a dozen QSOs. I heard one not ID for
over 15 minutes - I felt compelled to stay there and measure it. This destroys
the rate of people doing unassisted S&P. Many good contesters in the Caribbean
make great rates and ID every or nearly every QSO. So this practice is a way
to improve your rate by a tiny fraction at the cost of a HUGE impact on others.
This is not within the spirit or rules of any contest. It is poor
sportsmanship at best.
To make it worse, a few stations (and I will name names from my notes if asked)
refused a fill even when working a station asking "Call?" And I heard one
pointedly answered "NO" when a dozen in the pileup repeatedly asked for "CALL?"
This isn't just bad practice, it is spitting in the face of others who operate
skillfully.
I've actually had contesters tell me proudly how efficient they were because
after each QSO in a big run, they skip the TU and their call and just send a
dit. We need to change this mindset.
Perhaps no rule changes are needed. But I call upon all of you to join in
publicly noting that this isn't acceptable. And I call upon sponsors to get
tough on abusers. If no reasonable attitude is forthcoming, the solution is to
require a callsign every QSO. That may be seen by some as "extreme", but IMHO,
this is best practice in any case.
73, Drew K3PA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|