On Mon,2/22/2016 3:14 PM, Drew Vonada-Smith wrote:
I've actually had contesters tell me proudly how efficient they were because
after each QSO in a big run, they skip the TU and their call and just send a
dit. We need to change this mindset.
We do indeed. Randy, are you listening? I even started a brief
discussion about this on the N1MM reflector when a guy asked for a macro
to only ID after 3 QSOs. I said that this is not often enough, because
it slows down S&P operators a lot.
One way to get even is to delete the QSO from your log if you don't hear
their call in a reasonable time. And you would be entirely justified in
doing so -- if you don't know who you worked, it's not a QSO!
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|