CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net

To: <sawyered@earthlink.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Reply-to: k5zd@charter.net
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:53:08 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I would agree with that.

I have my contest logger set up not to post the breakdowns - only the
QSO/Mult totals and score.  That way no one can be tempted.  :)

Contesting at the highest levels is a game of information management.  Thus
the temptation to use every resource available. It is difficult to write a
rule that says follow the spirit of the rule no matter what you may read.


Randy, K5ZD


> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Ed Sawyer
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 7:39 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
> 
> 
> 
> W9SZ said "Supposing there were a website that listed real-time scores of
> other
> 
> stations - and that's all - with NO info on bands, band changes,
> 
> frequencies, times or anything other than their score at the moment."
> 
> 
> 
> In my opinion, this would not be assistance.  It's the band tallies that
> start crossing the line when provided realtime, I believe.
> 
> 
> 
> 73
> 
> 
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>