I concur with Tom.
Consider the contest exchange to be a form of message handling - would
we want to receive / send messages that we felt there was a fair chance
wasn't accurate?
73,
Steve
NN4X
On 4/13/2016 9:18 AM, Tom Haavisto wrote:
> Consider this (hypothetical) scenario. I run like mad, or S&P, making
> QSO's "fast and dirty", with no regard to accuracy, and I am happy with a
>> 50 percent error rate.
> Is that the message we want to send to folks when logging QSO's?
>
> The assumption being - make it up on sheer numbers, and let the score
fall
> where it may? This way, no worries if a difficult Q is correct or not -
> just play the odds, and hope for the best... *Some* of them will survive
> log checking... Clearly, this is NOT where we want to go.
>
> The assumption being - reward accuracy, and penalize errors.
>
>
> Tom - VE3CX
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|