CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured

To: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>,cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured
From: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:01:28 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Agree. At my weekly "radio lunch" with K5NA, K5OT, W5JAW, and N5TW, we came up with the same thing. Everyone should be able to work his/her own country for one point. This would not only encourage more activity, but eliminate one current irritation of the CQWW where people in your country call you and you either ignore them or work them to clear the frequency for weaker DX. That would level out the current rules where people are in small countries and can work others at high rates (at more points). It should help activity in large countries like W, RA, VU, VE, VK, BY, etc., as well as other counties that have significant ham radio populations.

It would allow more action on bands that currently are of little use at many "dead times," and of course would have a major impact on M/M stations.

Jim N3BB

At 12:37 PM 7/19/2016 -0400, VE2TZT wrote:
-1 point per contact for everybody whatever the country, the continent or the zone. (no more indecent continental border advantage as EA8, CN or even some extreme East Coast)

-The US states, the Canadian provinces and the Japanese call area become multipliers (then the multiplier potential in NA should be about the same as in EU)

Globally with that rules the East coast beams should turn 180 degrees more often and perhaps that should give more motivation to have some more traffic in NA during the second half of the night.

Gilles VA2EW


On 18/07/2016 18:13, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:
Other than moving some tectonic plates, what do you suggest would make CQ WW
more interesting for those not bordering the Atlantic Ocean?

Not useful to complain without offering a suggestion.

Randy, K5ZD

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Jim Brown
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 4:09 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured

On Sat,7/16/2016 4:21 PM, Barry wrote:
Was a requirement for consideration having grown up in NJ? :-)
qrz.com shows that all LIVE in the golden eastern half of NA. So VERY
unlikely that anything will happen to make these contests interesting for
stations contesting outside the Atlantic basin.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7688 / Virus Database: 4627/12619 - Release Date: 07/15/16

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>