CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max

Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max
From: Jeff Draughn <n0ost99@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 18:51:50 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So what amp that is comparable to the 87a is not expensive to repair?
Jeff
N0OST

On Wednesday, October 5, 2016, Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com> wrote:

> 87a amps are cheap for a good reason.  They do not age well.  Own one only
> if you really enjoy fixing yours monthly, if parts can be found.
> Owner of two at same time, sold long ago.
>
> Note...... band change/tune too slow for SO2R, maybe $3000 is too much.
> 73, Charly
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 8:15 PM, john@kk9a.com <javascript:;> <
> john@kk9a.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Alpha 87A's are pretty inexpensive now. I am not sure how it works
> without
> > Alpha Max, I owned one with Alpha Max and it tuned very nicely. My
> comment
> > regarding this amp is that they are very expensive to repair if you send
> > it back to the manufacture so be cautious what you purchase.
> >
> > John KK9A
> >
> >
> > To:     cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>>
> > Subject:        [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max
> > From:   Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com <javascript:;>>
> > Reply-to:       k9yc@arrl.net <javascript:;>
> > Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:47:09 -0700
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > I'm about to buy an Alpha 87A, early production, without the Alpha Max
> > Firmware. That's the feature that provides auto tuning (as opposed to
> auto
> > recall of saved settings, which was how the amp was originally built).
> >
> > Some questions.
> >
> >
> > 1) How useful is the Alpha Max auto-tune feature?
> >
> > 2) The new owner of Alpha says the upgrade kit is no longer available. Is
> > there an easy way to add it? That is, are the chips generic? I'm guessing
> > that at least one of the two chips is an EPROM. Is it practical to buy
> the
> > chips and copy the firmware from another 87A?
> >
> > 3) Is it worth going to the trouble? I would use it for my high dipoles
> > for 80 and 40M.
> >
> > Thanks and 73, Jim K9YC
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Charly, HS0ZCW
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>