CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power

To: prickler.schneider@t-online.de, n4zr@contesting.com, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power
From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 09:51:44 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 Whoa!


Hold the fort a moment there Chris, I don't believe Pete mentioned anything 
about this "governing body" being a part of the ARRL.  So let's not slam the 
League for something that they had nothing to do with, especially when they 
weren't even mentioned.


In fact, if were such a governing body to come about (and I am not sure that is 
a good idea, mind you, I need to think about this one), I personally would NOT 
want the ARRL, or for that matter the IARU, to be placed in any form of control 
over said organization -- simply to avoid any potential conflict of interest.  
(And the same would go for other national or international organizations that 
run major contests, including CQ Magazine.)
 
But, IMHO, long before we reach the point of discussing whether or not said 
governing body is required or even somewhat necessary, IMHO we need to conclude 
the ongoing discussion on whether or not the actions of the RDXC, especially 
with regards to entry reclassification due to alleged discrepancies in power 
levels, was fair, warranted, or even appropriate.


And related to that, if the general concensus is that the actions were, at 
best, inappropriate, as to whether or not RDXC results should continue to be 
used as part of the determination of potential entrants for WRTC and similar 
events.


73, ron w3wn


On 10/10/16, Christian Schneider wrote:

Pete,
could you please specify the intended consequences for those contests and 
national radio leagues and clubs not obeying to this world contest governing 
body? 
ARRL should present a planned DQ to someone outside ARRL?
Personal remark only.
73 chris dl8mbs

Am 10. Oktober 2016 15:14:25 MESZ, schrieb Pete Smith N4ZR 
<n4zr@contesting.com>:
>Not a wonderful list of options. I think any standard should apply to 
>all contests, not just RDXC. Perhaps a small board of respected 
>contesters could be set up to which contest organizers would present 
>their proposed adverse actions - not just for power but for other 
>infractions - unacknowledged assistance, etc. The board could be sworn
>
>to confidentiality to protect sources and methods being used.
>
>73, Pete N4ZR
>Download the new N1MM Logger+ at
><http://N1MM.hamdocs.com>. Check
>out the Reverse Beacon Network at
><http://reversebeacon.net>, now
>spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
>For spots, please use your favorite
>"retail" DX cluster.
>
>On 10/9/2016 6:42 PM, .. VE5ZX wrote:
>> Check out new contesting.com survey
>>
>> http://www.contesting.com/survey/
>>
>>
>> Syl - VE5ZX
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>