To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules |
From: | W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:31:24 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
The guys who started NAQP many years ago established rules that made it the somewhat unique set of contests that it is, and most participants like it the way it is. The statistics you posted yesterday obscured that fact by only looked at M2 data, without comparing those entries to single op. Right because M2 is the packet class. The point being is that 75 percent of the people that are listed for M2 are not multiop stations. Thus why that data was chosen. Like I said if the intent was to not use packet then why is packet allowed in M2? W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Topband: TopBand: Stew Perry Challenge, Tony Osman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, Jim Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules, David Gilbert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |