CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] disruptive event in 1977 (was: call sign history)

To: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>, kr2q@optimum.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] disruptive event in 1977 (was: call sign history)
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:52:34 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I took my Novice and General licenses in 1954-55 from a gentleman whose call was W8DX. Just a lucky roll of the dice? I don't think so. Clearly, the system was a lot less rigid and litigious in those days
73, Pete N4ZR
Download the new N1MM Logger+ at
<http://N1MM.hamdocs.com>. Check
out the Reverse Beacon Network at
<http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 1/10/2017 11:37 AM, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
Well, $100 here, $100 there, pretty soon you're talking about real money...


There were always rumors at the time that if you wanted a particular call, and 
you knew the right person to contact in Gettysburg, 'arrangements' could be 
made. And to be very clear, the 'right' person should not imply that this was 
someone soliciting for or taking a bribe... or if you prefer, an unearned 
gratuity.


Allegedly, as memory serves, some of the FCC staff at the time were or could be 
quite accommodating, if you asked nicely enough, and your informal request was 
reasonable enough.


Others were very much 'by the book' and would firmly but politely decline the 
request -- if they even responded at all.


And then there were those who, well, let's just say never turned down an 
opportunity to take advantage of their position, even if it was for relative 
pocket change. Fortunately those were very few, but there were a few. (And no, 
I don't get it either... losing your career, your reputation, and possibly 
serving jail time, for a mere pittance? Never did make sense, but still, it did 
happen)
- - -
In addition, if memory serves, one of the issues at the time was also related 
to an informal call request. If memory serves, someone requested a particular 
call on behalf of a club station, didn't get it, and then asked his 
congress-person's office to intervene. I think there was at least one such 
situation, there may have been more.


All in all, in the context of the time, it's almost no wonder that the FCC went 
to the current sequential call assignment system when they did, and were so 
recalcitrant about opening up Vanity calls under almost any circumstances, for 
so long.


73, ron w3wn
On 01/10/17, kr2q@optimum.net wrote: Speaking as a private citizen....
RE: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/2017-January/116177.html

I will never understand why folks risk their career for small dollar amounts. 
While $100 was a
lot more in 1977 than now (maybe not?), still, it is a paltry sum compared to 
one's career. WHY?
No doubt, there must have been a whistle-blower.

-------
RE: K1AR's post: 
http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/cq-contest/2017-January/116140.html

Equally, why do guys cheat during a contest? For what? These are not a 
life-altering events.
I just can't help but think back to the recent log-padding that caused a 
multi-year, retro DQ and
a multi-year ban. WHY? Was it worth it?

de Doug KR2Q

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>