CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] R: Re: R: 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC

To: Alessandro Gromme <5b4alx@gmail.com>, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] R: Re: R: 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:30:11 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm really not sure what to believe. I would hope that ultimately the
contest committee is acting in good faith.

I have not heard anything from them, hopefully they can issue a public
statement to clear things up.

Ria
N2RJ

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:21 AM Alessandro Gromme <5b4alx@gmail.com> wrote:

> I feel bad for anyone who gets DQ'ed in a contest as well if anyone has
> broken the rules and has been unmasked.
> if someone did not break the rules, and is accused of having done so, has
> clear and irrefutable evidence of not having done and is still qualified,
> this I call it "decide in advance and deliberately to exclude someone from
> the rankings."
>
> about your sentence: "They usually have some pretty solid evidence. The
> WRTC committee makes the rules for qualifying not CQ." well ... I can tell
> you that in my case they have an ip that is not located in my area, which,
> as belonging to a range of dynamic IP is in turn assigned to different
> users on the network, which can not in any way attributable specifically to
> me.
> I have a contract with the static IP Internet provider signed three years
> ago, an IP that never changes, and that is only assigned to my station.
> Now I ask: "who have secure and unassailable proof of something?"
>
> This is their strength, their luck: there are many people who can not
> believe that the committee is acting improperly and therefore assumes that
> they are always right, even in these cases as plugging your eyes or putting
> your head under the sand like ostriches but it is not so
>
> 2017-02-21 4:43 GMT+01:00 Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>:
>
> > I feel bad for anyone who gets DQ'ed in a contest. That being said I'm
> 100
> > percent sure that the CQWW contest committee doesn't take the decision to
> > disqualify someone lightly. Especially if it's someone in a position to
> > quality for a WRTC slot. They usually have some pretty solid evidence.
> The
> > WRTC committee makes the rules for qualifying not CQ.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>