CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW

To: "'Ed Muns'" <ed@w0yk.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW
From: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:22:45 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Actually, since the CQ WW RTTY contest was happy to get 500 logs in back in the 
late 90s, I think it was likely to have at least someone to work.  But I could 
be wrong.

Now that it has "grown up" very nicely to 3000 logs submitted (which is 
actually where the CQ WW SSB or CW results were back in the 90s), it would seem 
that the same country points are no longer necessary.

73

Ed  N1UR

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Muns [mailto:ed@w0yk.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 10:47 AM
To: sawyered@earthlink.net
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW

The CQ WW RTTY DX Contest rules include VE areas and US states as multipliers 
in order to better balance the multiplier opportunity between European and NA 
participants.  In recent years about 3000 logs are received compared to 8000 on 
CW.



On Sep 25, 2017 5:22 PM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Its actually called the CQ World Wide DX Contest.  The reason that 
> domestic contacts do not count for points should be quite clear based 
> on the actual name of the contest.
>
>
>
> I believe the rules were amended for the RTTY contest because there 
> was initially so little participation that it needed an enhancement to 
> be viable.  If its now become much more popular, the CQ WW DX RTTY 
> should actually consider adopting the traditional rules.
>
>
>
> Find a contest that suits your style and location and enjoy.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>