Sorry Mike, I disagree.
If someone does not wish a cert mailed, that's fine. Use the CERTIFICATES NO
option then, it's easy enough to implement.
But given the relatively small cost of mailing out a few certs, I don't see a
major cost savings by dropping them.
It may seem otherwise to the grizzled veterans on this reflector, but outside
of this realm, I think you'll find more than a few souls who would be happy to
keep getting those certs.
Now even so, it should be easy enough to implement a "reprint" option for those
who wish to download a cert, be it from a current contest or an old one. I
don't see an issue with enabling an option to do so. But not as an "either/or"
situation.
As the young whippersnapper said to Dottie Henson, "Can't we do both?"
73, ron w3wn
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of W0MU
Mike Fatchett
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 6:46 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Certificates for ARRL DX - a great motivator for new
contesters
Other than plaques the ARRL needs to go to a download your award system like
CQ. This would eliminate the need for a Certificates NO.
For marketing purposes I can see sending out certs to new people, but someone
would have to stay on top of that and I don't see that happening.
I was actually surprised that when I go to my account on the ARRL that I am not
able to download previous certificates.
W0MU
On 4/4/2018 3:31 PM, Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest wrote:
> Printed certificates do matter to experienced contesters; they are a
> waste of the ARRL’s money. I’d rather have that money go to something
> more useful like spectrum defense or RFI mitigation, than spending
> over a dollar to send me a certificate saying I was the top low power
> all band section award winner in a VHF contest. (I think they even
> send those certificates to those who merely had the high score on a
> single band.)
>
> ARRL ought to adopt support of the Cabrillo "CERTIFICATES: NO” tag. I’ve
> suggested this to my division director, who seemed receptive. But apparently
> at the last Board meeting there was too much other stuff going on.
>
>
> 73 - Jim K8MR
>
>
>
>> On Apr 4, 2018, at 10:21 AM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I know that some contest sponsors have done away with printed
>> certificates to cut costs, and this is understandable. I have no
>> problem with keeping it sustainable.
>>
>> But I would just like to point out that I have seen quite a few
>> people on social media sharing unexpected ARRL DX certificates. These
>> are usually single op, low power entrants who decided to sit at the
>> radio and work the contest even though they have zero chance of
>> winning one of the big prizes. Some are even encouraged to try even
>> harder and get into contesting more.
>>
>> I think if possible, at least for first time entries that contest
>> sponsors should look to get the certificates to encourage these
>> contesters. There is nothing like finding out that you did well
>> enough to win *something* to encourage you into diving deeper into
>> contesting. Online certifiicates are nice but there is nothing like
>> opening the mailbox and finding a real certificate. This isn't really
>> a participation trophy - these folks topped their section, or maybe
>> earned a single band award. IARU also gives for 250 QSOs, which was
>> my initial motivator for participating in the IARU contest and why it
>> holds a special place for me.
>>
>> For experienced contesters like myself and others, printed
>> certificates really don't matter - we go for the big awards or even
>> just our callsign in the results column. So for us we can mostly opt
>> out. But I think for the newcomers it is important,
>>
>> 73
>> Ria, N2RJ
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|