I agree with Hans. I don't see any need to have FT8 signals spotted on
RBN. Yes, I do use FT8 quite a bit.
73,
Jim N6VH
On 6/12/2018 9:32 AM, Radio KØHB wrote:
Since virtually all FT8 operations are clustered into their own 3kHz smoking-pit on each band, the mode
requires no “searching around the band” for individual signals. Essentially the entire
workable “band” of FT8 signals is visible at your own station without an outside feed.
That, coupled with the very detailed graphic presentations at sites like
pskreporter.info and pskreporter.de, seems to make a traditional CW-style
spotting network for of low value to an FT8 operator. In fact, I would posit
that the traditional Spotting/RBN infrastructure is really rather quaint and
unsophisticated when compared to the information available at pskreporter.info.
73, de Hans, KØHB
"Just a boy and his radio"™
From: N4ZR n4zr@comcast.net [DX-IS]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 1:35 PM
To: RBN-OPS@groups.io; sysops@dxcluster.info; WW1ME@arrl.org;
DX-IS@yahoogroups.com; reflector cq-contest
Subject: [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting
As some may be aware, we’ve been debating for some time about whether the RBN should handle FT8 spots. A few weeks, ago, several prolific RBN nodes began spotting FT8 signals, using the combination of WSJT-X and an unreleased Aggregator, version 5. The purpose of this limited Alpha test was to get a feel for the load and other implications of carrying FT8 spots on the RBN; it has been very revealing.
The most striking characteristic of FT8 spots is their sheer quantity. Here
are some weekday statistics from one of the US testers:
23-May
CW 4294 14%
RTTY 69 0.22%
FT8 26318 86%
Total 30681
24-May
CW 4370 13%
RTTY 46 0.14%
FT8 29298 87%
Total 33714
Whether due to the startling popularity of the new mode, or to the ability to spot
stations at 22 dB below the noise level, it seems obvious that adding FT8 spots to
our spot flow could have a huge impact on the infrastructure of the RBN. These
numbers suggest that if only 20-30 RBN nodes added FT8 spots, those spots could
outnumber the total CW and RTTY spots being delivered by the 140-150 nodes currently
active on the network, doubling the total required throughput.
We frankly don’t know whether the RBN servers will be up to the task, so we decided
we had better find out before the fall contest season is upon us. Accordingly, we are
taking the following steps on a Beta test basis:
1. Effective immediately, the RBN’s current spot feed (telnet,reversebeacon.net
port 7000) will be repurposed to handle only CW and RTTY spots.
telnet.reversebeacon.net port 7001 will be set up for FT8 spots only.
2. Operators of “retail” DX clusters are encouraged to offer the option of RBN spots with and
without FT8 spots, as they now often give users a choice between spot streams with and without
“Skimmer” spots, and to advertise when they begin to carry FT8 spots
3. A Beta test version of Aggregator Version 5 that can handle FT8 spots received
from WSJT-X will be made available on the RBN web site, along with instructions on
how RBN node-ops can configure their nodes to spot FT8 on one or multiple
bands. Note, please, that doing so will not interfere with your ability to
continue spotting CW and RTTY.
We will closely monitor how the RBN servers handle this new load, as more and more nodes
begin sending FT8 spots. We also reserve the right to take steps as necessary to
protect the core mission of the RBN, including shutting off the FT8 stream on major CW
and RTTY contest weekends or, in an extreme case, discontinuing spotting of FT8
altogether. Even in a worst case scenario, FT8 spots will continue to be carried by
PSKReporter.
We hope we’re not doing this in a vacuum. The RBN team has been collecting the views of
contesters and DXers on this, and we think that we’re headed in the right direction. Feel
free to let us know what you think of this experiment.
73,
The RBN Team (KM3T, N4ZR, PY1NB, SV3SJ, W3OA)
__._,_.___
Posted by: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Reply via web post
•
Reply to sender
•
Reply to group
•
Start a New Topic
•
Messages in this topic (1)
Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on
the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes
(Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with
1000GB of free cloud storage.
VISIT YOUR GROUP
• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
__,_._,___
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|