CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciprocity in signal strength

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciprocity in signal strength
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 11:11:46 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 1/22/2023 7:19 AM, Tom Hellem wrote:
That sounds reasonable on paper. But in the real world it seems more complicated than that. Local 
noise can really throw things out of whack. When I operate from my city qth, I’m hamstrung 
with a constant S-5 noise level, and at times it gets up to S-8. There is no doubt it costs me 
100’s of q’s in a contest.

Yes, I've long been convinced that many (most?( instances assigned to "one way propagation" are really differences in RX noise, or of propagation from directions on the other end of the QSO that are stronger than other than mine. One example is a few hours after the start of 160M contests, when I'm hearing bigger east coast stations plenty well enough to copy, but they don't hear me. Yes, directional RX antennas on both ends is a factor, but because the band is open to the east for them, they have both signals and noise propagated from the east.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>