Excuse my ignorance but I don't understand why this poses a problem to you
other than the fact that you don't like cut numbers.
You know what type of repors the contest you're taking part requires so this
does not cause any comprehension problems (besides I am not sure that you
transmit 599 instead of 5NN...).
So is this your ham spirit to want to impose your way of operating on those who
do not practice the same way as you?
Is there nothing more important in your life ?
73, Dimitri F4DSK
Le 17 déc. 2024 à 22:59, à 22:59, Frank Maynard NF8M <nf8m@fmaynard.com> a
écrit:
>In reply to John K3TN's comment
>
>> A few months ago, after remotely opping OZ5W as part of a MM in the
>SAC CW and running into cut numbers in variable serial numbers, I
>reached out to the ARRL, WPX and CA QP test to recommend prohibiting
>cut numbers in non ST exchange fields.
>Saw them quite a bit in the 10M ARRL this past weekend.
>
>Jim K8MR wrote:
>
>
>> I don't think cut numbers could be outlawed - can you imagine how
>> that would be enforced?
>
>Unless there are contest-committee-appointed monitors listening to each
>QSO, it would have to be enforced at the grass-roots level. If we would
>all ask for a repeat from any station sending a cut number, and again
>until they send the full number, the practice might end rather quickly.
>I encountered a few cut number exchanges which threw me for an instant,
>and thought about asking for a repeat.
>
>--
>73,
>Frank Maynard, NF8M
>nf8m@arrl.net
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|