RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] CFL bulbs - NO WAY

To: "Bob Gates" <regates@hughes.net>,"W6YN Don Milbury" <w6yn@juno.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] CFL bulbs - NO WAY
From: "Jim P" <jvpoll@dallas.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:46:31 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
"But wait a minute.  Some studies point out the reduced
  activity of birds and bees within a 100 mile radius of
  some of these sites."

Need a *cite on just one of those studies, please.

Jim P // WB5WPA //


* Cite: Name of publication, publication date, Title,
   author(s) names.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Gates" <regates@hughes.net>
To: "W6YN Don Milbury" <w6yn@juno.com>
Cc: <rfi@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: [RFI] CFL bulbs - NO WAY


> Don et.al.,
>
> If you can logically explain to me how the subject of "busted bulbs" can
> lead to a review of the state of global warming on Mars, I'll be quiet and
> just see where this thing is going.  But you might want to consider an
> alternative track.  What happens to these "busted bulbs"?  Presumably,
they
> wind up in garbage cans, and your local waste management company delivers
> them to landfills.  And, speaking of landfills, are you aware that
literally
> thousands of current and inactive land fills have been certified by the
EPA
> as superfund cleanup sights.  And speaking of the EPA, why is their
> stewardship of these cleanup sites in question?  Could it be because
Bush's
> hacks have put an industry lobbyist is charge of this activity?  Nay, you
> say, it's just to counter the tree-hugging liberals who are ruining our
> economy!  But, wait a minute.  There are numerous studies by clearly
> independent think tanks on the management of, or even the necessity for,
> superfunds.  How do you know they're independent?  Because they said they
> are stupid.  But wait a minute.  Some studies point out the reduced
activity
> of birds and bees within a 100 mile radius of some of these sites.  That's
a
> fact Jack.  So now we have "busted bulbs" connected to reduced "birds and
> bees" normal activities.  (I shudder to think I've just provided some with
> at least five tangents to take with this subject.)
>
> But it makes a lot more sense than just about anything I've read so far.
I
> repeat my request.  And please take the "birds and bees" other activities
> with you.
>
> Bob, W7BJ
>

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>