Shucks, that's another point, you got to be a Philadelphia lawyer to find and
understand all that government gobbly gook.
I'm not even sure where or if there is a field office in my city or near by. I
imagine it's like calling the IRS.
Maybe what we need is a repository of complaints, then say once a month the
caretaker of the repository sends a letter to his/her contact at the FCC with a
request that written corrective action report be sent back within 30 days.
73
Dale, k9vuj
On 12, Feb 2014, at 9:43, CR <ka5s@earthlink.net> wrote:
> This may be a good one to complain about anyway given the broad spectrum of
> interference reported; it will affect broadcast, air to ground
> communications, police, fire and commercial radio reception as well.
>
> FWIW, Part 97 is not where you should look for illumination devices; look in
> Part 18. Harmful interference *is* unlawful.
>
>
> Cortland Richmond
>
> PS: Apologies for mistaking you for the other Dale. He and I have been
> working in EMC for years.
>
> On 2/12/2014 10:25 AM, Dale J. wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> Now that statement I'll agree with. I will too.
>>
>> Even if I were to call the FCC to complain would I talk to a live human who
>> knows what I'm talking about or would it be a robot that directs me to a FAQ
>> on how to deal with RFI.
>>
>> 73
>> Dale, K9vuj
>>
>>
>> On 12, Feb 2014, at 8:12, Roger D Johnson<n1rj@roadrunner.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >Unfortunately, interference to amateur radio appears to be VERY low
>>> >on the FCC priorities list. I'll probably be an SK long before they
>>> >act on my complaint!
>>> >
>>> >73, Roger
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|