Although I've heard this mentioned several times, I have never had
anything but good reports. Usually 599's, never 598's, or 597's.
Others reports?
73 de Dave KB6JOX
>----------
>From: Allan G. Taylor[SMTP:ataylor@midas.llnl.gov]
>Sent: Monday, June 23, 1997 10:24 AM
>To: tentec@contesting.com
>Subject: [TenTec] OmniV/VI cw characteristics
>
>A recent thread mentioned the cw keying waveform of the OmniV/VI as being not
>up to the usual TT standard. While I have heard a few OmniVIs that were off
>the mark, it is not so for all of them. In particular, I recall that the
>OmniV
>of K7UOT as having particulary sweet and stable keying. I would like to know
>what the concensus is regarding both the OmniV and OmniVI with regard to cw
>keying. Additionally, is there a known fix? If not, is someone looking into
>it?
>For those with the problem, is it possibly a power supply stiffness problem?
>(i.e., not stiff enough for the demands of cw--I have noted that often on
>lesser rigs, Icoms in particular).
>
>The OmniVI+ has become my target rig for a funds-raising effort and I want to
>know if there are any flies in the ointment that can't be removed!
>
>Grant K7GT k7gt@qsl.net
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|