> Selecting my 500hz (alone) produces a greatly attenuated signal
> compared to using the 250hz (alone)....almost to the point that I will
:These are the 6.3 MHz IF filters? The 9 MHz NAR position has a little
:amp you need to set correctly for a CW filter, it looks like you have
:that done right?
Look at page 1-4 of the manual. In figure 1-5, you'll see a "Gain Select
Jumper" for the NARROW filter (9 MHz IF Board). In order to get maximum
gain for my 500 Hz NAR filter, I had to set the jumper the *opposite* of
what this diagram indicated. When I called the factory, they acknowledged
that things had changed since the manual was written. For a CW filter,
use whichever position gave the most gain.
If your radio is like mine, one position of the jumper will make the
signal go down several S-units when you select the NAR filter. The other
position, you'll get almost the same signal strength whether the NAR
filter is selected or not.
73,
Peter - KD7MW
---
* My opinions do not necessarily represent those of Seattle University.
* Newsreaders may have an incorrect return address. Use pklein@seattleu.edu
Peter A. Klein (pklein@seattleu.edu) : -----==3== --- ---
Network Administrator, LAN/WAN/Novell : | | | | | | | |
Seattle University, 296-5569 : @| @| @| @| @| @| @| @|
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|