>can vouch for the InRad filters, though. I have the stock TT filters
>in all positions [9 MHz IF] except 250 Hz, which is an InRad filter.
>It is excellent! There is not as much loss as the stock TT 250 filter,
>and my opinion is that it is centered better than the TT filters in my
rig.
I assume in YOUR rig you have used the TT 250Hz filter then opted for
the Inrad filter. How good can it get? Pretty expensive test, can I
have
your spare TT 250Hz filter? I'll give $25 for that "second rate"
filter.
> now which is a better filter, the TT filters or the Irad. What offers
the
> best performance for the buck.
>For the buck....Well I already had the TT filters so that's an easy one.
>I'm sure those who purchased Inrads think they are better.
But of course.
73,
Joe Blackwell - AA4NN
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|