TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] TT vs. INRAD Filters

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] TT vs. INRAD Filters
From: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 17:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Enjoying this thread ;-)
So many choices, lots of great filters, so much fun!

Okay, back down to earth.
Wanted to reply to Jim's comment below:

Why can't the INRAD 2.4 filter fit into the N-1 or N-2
filter socket and be cascaded with the INRAD 2.8?  I
was hoping to do this myself.  Are the pin
configurations different for the "permanent" socket
and the "N" sockets?  I didn't think there was any
difference.

73 all,
Barry  N1EU

--- Jim Reid <jreid@aloha.net> wrote:
> 

> Of course,  you cannot add the 2.8Khz filter for
> improved CW note,  and the new 10 pole 2.4kHz
> filter in the same rig:  they both go into the same
> socket in the Omni VI.  That is the permanent first
> socket that is "in" the firtst IF path all the time,
>  and
> not switched in/out via a button push.  You must
> decide if you want to improve your SSB selectivity
> capabiltiy,  or how you sound on CW!
> 
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>