| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re: TT vs 756PROII |
| From: | <n4lq@iglou.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:51:21 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I've asked a few 756 pro owners about the truncation and most are using external keyers to compensate for it by cranking up the weight so this isn't too serious. The pro's cw notes all sound very clean with no chirp as on the Omni 6+. I would guess that a large percentage of 6+ ops use external keyers too, not because of truncation but because it's difficult to mentally adapt to the keyer/sidetone timing. > TenTec mailing list > TenTec@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re: TT vs 756PROII, George, W5YR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RE: More About Clix, Paul Christensen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: TT vs 756PROII, Steve Ellington |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten Tec] Pegasus keying...was More About Clix, Duane A Calvin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |