TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Argo V--first impressions

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Argo V--first impressions
From: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 16:44:38 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hello:

I received from Ten-Tec yesterday a new (demo) Argonaut V with TCXO, which I got primarily for CW. Not surprisingly, the QSK is excellent and sooo quiet. What came as a pleasant surprise is the quality of reception on CW and SSB. On CW, the software filtering allows tremendous flexibility in cruising the CW portion of a band--you can start at say 1000 kHz and then when you find something, narrow down to 200 Hz if need be with just a twist of the Multi knob. A Passband Tuning feature allows movement of the passband up to nearly +/- 3 kHz with a flick of the same Multi knob. In neither case does the fine CW tone become "ringy." Sensitivity is excellent, and the receiver has a low noise floor to go along with it. On SSB receive, audio quality is quite high.

I haven't had time to do much transmitting, so no comments there. (I'll be very interested in the ARRL lab's report on the Argonaut's CW keying envelope, etc., when it appears. I suspect Mike Tracy & Co. will go over the new rig with a fine-tooth comb.)

The panel, display and knobs and buttons are all first rate, as is the manual.

If wishes were horses: Since the Argonaut serves triple-purposes as a homebase/portable/mobile HF rig, I'd like to see Ten-Tec build on this success by adding: (1) dual receive, (2) max 100 watts output (instead of 20), and (3) providing a somewhat larger desktop footprint. In other words, a poor man's Orion, priced somewhere around the Mark V Field.

Next week's ARRL CW DX contest will provide an acid test for the Argonaut's front end, and I fully expect that it will not hold up as well as say, my FT-1000MP Mark V. But in terms of fun and all-around usefulness, I suspect the Argonaut is going to be hard to beat.

73,
John, W3ULS

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>