| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion |
| From: | "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:00:44 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Anyone know if the League has documented and disclosed its step-by-step Product Review testing methods and procedures? Specifically, is each measuring instrument calibrated against a traceable standard before each product evaluation? And, what assurance and validation process takes place to ensure that their results are accurate? At a minimum, I would hope that their test results are repeated, and conducted by alternate personnel to validate the procedure, notwithstanding test equipment measuring error. -Paul, W9AC |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers, Grant Youngman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion, Stuart Rohre |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion, Cliff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |