| To: | Kc9cdt@aol.com, tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Another reason for PTT CW |
| From: | wa3fiy@radioadv.com |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:12:08 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 30 Dec 2003 at 12:28, Kc9cdt@aol.com wrote: > Hi Guys, > I like the fact that TT (Thanks Scott!) has excellant QSK. > > HOWEVER, I WOULD LIKE TO ALSO HAVE THE OPTION OF PTT, BECAUSE, I HATE TO HEAR > ALL OF THE DARN BAND NOISE (OR JUST THE RX COMING ON) IN BETWEEN WORDS! > > Doesn't anyone else care about that? > Yes I certainly do, that's why I back off the RF Gain most of the time. Have you tried that? If not, you might be pleasantly surprised at the result. No loss of signals, lots of loss of noise. :-) -73-, another Lee. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Another reason for PTT CW, Rick Westerman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Argo V #516 vs. Omni 6+ #564 RX performance, wa3fiy |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] Another reason for PTT CW, Rick Westerman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Another reason for PTT CW, Carl Moreschi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |