Hay Great Idea ! John kb2huk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published
> Why don't you suggest that option to them? Nothing says that they
can't
> have a DSP/CPU upgrade from time to time.
>
> 73,
>
>
> Bernard, WA4OEJ
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <N0KHQ@aol.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 1:36 PM
> Subject: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published
>
>
> > I personally hope that the IC-7800 performs well for its intended use
and
> > audience.
> >
> > The only thing that bothers me, is what Icom did to the IC-756
following.
> > (IC-756, 756Pro and then the 756Proll) You would think that Icom users
> would have
> > learned their lesson the first time around. Here we go again!
> > For this one reason alone, I dont trust Icom or their marketing tactics.
> >
> > I sure do wish TT would take a look at the new Texas Instruments DSP
> > chip......its a high speed smoker.
> >
> >
> > 73
> > John / N0KHQ / St. Louis
> >
> > Always on 18.130
> >
> > Antennas:
> >
> > You can build 'em better than you can buy 'em
> > Please visit the sites below:
> > http://www.hamuniverse.com/
> > http://cebik.com/nokhq/html
> > http://www.ssb-audio.com/forum/
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|