[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is
From: "Mike N9IVO" <n9ivo@comcast.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:47:55 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I always considered full-break-in (full qsk) to be where I can hear
between all sent characters, more to make sure no doubling with the
station is taking place than anything else, as this will cause much confusion.
It also lets one avoid sending while a dx station is sending and not
listening. It also lets a station to interrupt the other station's sending if
needed, like mentioned already in this thread.

I never understood the term: semi-break-in. Either you can break in
or not. There IS no semi-break-in!!#&$&%&%*  Slow qsk is a much
more accurate term.

Mike N9IVO

_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>