TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

To: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:51:54 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Martin, AA6E wrote:

>AM forever! - read the article:
>
Oops...I guess I did not read the text carefully enough, and made the 
completely rediculous assumption that the pictorial chart 
representations would be complete and accurate.

>
>"The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules
>continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent
>sideband (ISB) as specific exceptions to the 3 kHz bandwidth
>limit--with restrictions of 9 kHz and 6 kHz respectively.
>
DE N6KB


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>