Me also! You know if they are trying to regulate by bandwidth, they have
something up there sleeve that probably is not going to be good for the
hobby!
Tommy
W4BQF
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Ira Franklin
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:40 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"
Guess I just get nervous with some of their plans, still remember that they
were the group that brought the great boon of incentive licenseing to ham
radio.
Ira K4YMQ
Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> wrote:
Martin, AA6E wrote:
>AM forever! - read the article:
>
Oops...I guess I did not read the text carefully enough, and made the
completely rediculous assumption that the pictorial chart
representations would be complete and accurate.
>
>"The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules
>continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent
>sideband (ISB) as specific exceptions to the 3 kHz bandwidth
>limit--with restrictions of 9 kHz and 6 kHz respectively.
>
DE N6KB
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|