TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph
From: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:27:30 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
is this all a riddle?
jack

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II Freqency response graph


>> Most keep their filters set at 3000 Hz or 2400 Hz so anything
>> more than that is just wasting bandwidth.
>>
>> I really don't understand the fuss.
>
>
> Ok, so you go out and trade in your fabulous 2003 Dodge Viper, that makes
> your heart race just looking at it, on a 2006 Viper.  You take it to a
> track, and discover that it tops out at 87.6 mph.  And the 0-60 time is 
> now
> 9 seconds.
>
> You contact Dodge, and they tell you that since they changed the 
> programming
> of the car's computer in 2006 it will no longer go any faster than that, 
> no
> matter what the literature says.  They just didn't want to bother changing
> the speedometer to be a bit more realistic.  And besides, you can get to 
> the
> mall just fine with a car that won't go any faster than 87.6 mph, and
> usually you just drive at around 70 mph anyway, and you can't use that 
> much
> accelleration on a normal street.
>
> Would you go home and just say "I really don't understand the fuss"?
> Really?
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>