TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec, Jupiter, etc.

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec, Jupiter, etc.
From: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 17:29:23 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Now it's time for 6/6/6 on 20m on 150ft of Rohn 55 if you have money you 
have to spend :-) Good way to get to know your neighbors better also! Plus, 
there is always the K9MI, Save the Polar Bears fund.

73, Mike K9MI


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Buhyoff, Greg" <buhyoff@vt.edu>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2006 15 47
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec, Jupiter, etc.


> Just wanted to throw in my comments about the Jupiter and Ten-Tec.  First, 
> I've owned a lot of HF transceivers (No Orions yet -- but soon I hope).  I 
> use an FT 1000, Omni VI plus, Argonaut V and a Jupiter. I have had several 
> FT 1000 versions, an FT 990, IC 746, 756, 761, 765, 781 etc. and Kenwoods 
> of all colors.  I guess I've owned about 30 or 35 transceivers along the 
> way.
>
> I love my Omni VI plus.  But, it is odd, with all the radios I have had 
> and have, it is the darn Jupiter that keeps getting the air time.  When I 
> first got it, some folks, with the greatest intentions, told me that is 
> was a good radio but had not been updated (firmware) in a while.  I got 
> lucky after I  bought a new one.  BINGO, two new firmware updates came out 
> and the one that counted the most to me was the new filtering changes. 
> Strong adjacent signals can be taken care of with the bandwidth control 
> and even when it is tightened down to as low as 1650, the SSB audio is 
> clearly intelligible.  The Jupiter has the nicest receive audio I have 
> heard (and actually, the Argonaut V right there with it).  The new 
> filtering algorithms in the latest version are excellent and the noise 
> floor is outstanding.  I can easily read S1 signals on 40 meters with 
> it -- of course assuming no loud atmospherics, etc.  It simply has an 
> excellent receiver.  I am sure the Orion is much better.  I a
> ctually prefer the Jupiter's receiver (with the new upgrades) in some ways 
> to the Omni VI plus --- The VI plus is better in other ways.  But this is 
> not a comment about a comparison of the two but a general comment about 
> Ten-Tec transceivers, from my own experience.  I work both CW (wonderful 
> on CW) and SSB.  I am not a digital mode op.  I wouldn't trade any of the 
> Ten-Tec radios I have.  I have been a Ten-Tec owner for about 18 years 
> with many Icoms, Yaesus and Kenwoods mixed in along the way.  And, the 
> performance of the Ten-Tecs have always been better, in my personal 
> opinion and according to my tastes in operating, than the many other 
> radios I've had and tried side by side with the Ten-Tecs.  The Service 
> folks at Ten-Tec are outstanding.  They answer questions, help you trouble 
> shoot, if you should need it, and give you time on the phone that is above 
> and beyond anything I have ever experienced.  No, I am not a Ten-Tec 
> groupie ....... I just give credit where credit is d
> ue.  I could go on as many others on this group could --- but, I'll stop 
> here and simply give my nod to Ten-Tec, their customer assistance and 
> their equipment.
>
> 73,
> Greg K2UM
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>