TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Roofing Filters

To: <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>,"Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Roofing Filters
From: "Phil Chambley, Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:20:22 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I thought the term "Roofing Filter" was meant to describe a filter
immediately following a mixer stage, its purpose being to shave off unwanted
mixer products before any post-mixer amplification.

Phil
www.k4dpk.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
To: <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 5:16 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Roofing Filters


In my previous post I should have changed the subject title.
Another observation about the term "roofing filter":
I don't recall hearing the term used until receivers were being made
that used IF DSP.
Is the term only applicable to receivers using IF DSP?
I know that Inrad makes a roofing filter modification for the Omni VI
rigs. Is that an incorrect usage of the term?
All filters in all stages of a receiver perform essentially the same
functions. That is to limit the bandwidth that following stages have to
handle, and when before a mixer to reject image response, or when before
a ADC in a DSP receiver to reduce aliasing responses. So what makes some
filters "roofing filters" and others not?

DE N6KB


>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>