TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Roofing Filters

To: Carl Moreschi <n4py@arrl.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Roofing Filters
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:05:30 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Carl,

That is a pretty broad definition. Every filter in my receiver from the frontend bandpass filters to the first IF and second IF filters limit bandwidth before the final audio filtering. So there is virtually no filter, by that definition, that is not a roofing filter. I'm not intending to be argumentative. I am just trying to find out what people really mean by the term "roofing filter". I suspect that without a clear definition, the term is being used slightly differently by every one who uses it.

It seems that most of the time people are referring to a filter after the first mixer (regardless of whether it is a up conversion to a higher frequency IF or to a mid HF IF). Yet the term may also apply to narrow tuning range (typically QRP rig) receivers that have a crystal filter before any mixer stage. I have not heard anyone call an LC BPF a roofing filter. So does it have to be a crystal filter to be "roofing"?

N6KB

Carl Moreschi wrote:
The term roofing filter means a filter that limits bandwidth before the
final stage of filtering.  Because of this, roofing filters do not have to
have sharp shape factors.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>