Clark, appreciate hearing you results, do you engage it with
just N1 or N2 or with both?
Currently just have a 500 in the N2 slot, 90 percent of my
operating is weak signal, usually low band 160/80 and dealing
with noise etc. No local QRM out here, not other hams on the
island active. So thats not my problem..
My only problem with the omni 6 upgrade 3 is all the birdies that
bug listening to weak signals, perhaps it just this radio. May
look for a omni 6 plus as hear they are better in the birdie dept.
73 Merv K9FD/KH6
>Subject to what Terry said from his QTH - I find the 600 Hz (lower
>center freq.) roofing filter to be very helpful in heavy QRM and noise
>situations for my ears. It helps the audio DSP to engage better when
>the signal is just next to the noise for my ears, I really can hear the
>difference. I mostly deal with noise and digging down to try to hear a
>weak one, not big time QRM. However, when there is big time QRM right
>nearby, and I mean right nearby, I use the roofing filter and the other
>two filter options and can really clean the signal up. I am a
>believer.
>Clark
>
>On Jun 14, 2007, at 8:52 AM, PaulKB8N@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
>>I only see a couple of entries in the eHam reviews for the Inrad
>>roofing
>>filters for the Omni VI. I'm considering getting the CW version and
>>would
>>appreciate any comments on the performance enhancement that these
>>filters provide.
>>
>>
>
>Clark Savage Turner, J.D., Ph.D.
>WA3JPG
>Professor of Computer Science
>Cal Poly State University
>San Luis Obispo, CA. 93407
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|