TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Bazooka antenna.. More than you wanted to know!

To: geraldj@storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Bazooka antenna.. More than you wanted to know!
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:16:54 +0100
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jerry

Its probable that there is a better choice of antenna and compensating
circuit resonant frequencies that would dispense with the need for the
75 ohm feed line, and likely a better choice of capacitor to give a
smaller circle and so a lower SWR across the band. When I created and
computed the antenna, I had only slide rule and Smith chart, no NEC
computer program, and not much of a good network analysis program if
any. I had worked with network analysis programs but I think I had
graduated by the time I did that antenna and had lost access to that
mainframe and programs that worked with it.
I reckon you did a pretty good job without access to NEC. I just modelled the arrangement using EZNEC and tried a lot of different combinations of L, C and the length of the 75 Ohm section. At best I beat your 2:1 VSWR bandwidth by only 40 KHz. My final values were: C=1575pF, L=1.14uH, length of 75 Ohm section: 920" (electrical). All of that was without any loss built into the model - if you include losses the bandwidth improves again of course.

I can find no way to dispense with the 75 Ohm section. The parallel compensation always has the effect of increasing the Resistive component of the impedance, and then you have to have some transformer section with an intermediate-value Zo to get back close to 50 Ohms.

73,
Steve G3TXQ


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>