| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] SWR VS Power Loss |
| From: | "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:50:08 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:04:46 -0400, DAVID HELLER wrote: >Jim, your statement is incomplete. Should read, "..any EE who lacks a copy >of the ARRL hand book ...." >How many hams realize that the Handbook ranks very near the top of the list >of all-time best selling books. I agree. I've recommended it to many colleagues working on the technical side of pro audio, and to many who want to get started in any kind of radio or electronics. I've often said that I thought more people working in various forms of electronics have learned the fundamentals from the Handbook than all other sources combined. 73, Jim K9YC |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] SWR VS Power Loss, DAVID HELLER |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss, Jim WA9YSD |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] SWR VS Power Loss, DAVID HELLER |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] SWR VS Power Loss, Ken Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |