TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!

To: "'Ron Castro'" <ronc@sonic.net>, "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!
From: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:42:34 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
It sounds like TenTec has someone "new" working with the software and who
doesn't have a firm grasp of what is going on.  It is definitely hard to
understand why they released something with so many defects.

There is obviously a lot of interaction between many of the functions so
whoever is doing the programming would need to have a real good
understanding of how the radio works.  They would also need to be able to
turn the radio on and use it.  Based on user reports, it doesn't sound like
this is the case.

All-in-all, it is a baffling situation.  It has to make everyone wonder
about TenTec's commitment to the O and O-II.

If the code and appropriate notes were released into the public domain then
maybe some of the users could do a better job.    


------------------ Wes Attaway (N5WA) ------------------
1138 Waters Edge Circle - Shreveport, LA 71106
    318-797-4972 (office) - 318-393-3289 (cell)
        Computer Consulting and Forensics
-------------- EnCase Certified Examiner ---------------
 

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Ron Castro
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:50 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!

I'm glad we're only test piloting software and not airplanes, or I'd be a 
goner for sure!

            Ron Castro
  Chief Technical Officer
     Results Radio, LLC
                N6IE
       www.N6IE.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Rsoifer@aol.com>
To: <ronc@sonic.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!


> Ron and others,
>
> Many thanks for your fine work.  After playing with 2.042A overnight, 
> I've
> re-installed 2.041XT and will await T-T's next try.
>
> 73 Ray W2RS
>
>
> In a message dated 4/14/2010 2:45:00 A.M. GMT Standard Time, 
> ronc@sonic.net
> writes:
>
> I keep  hoping that it's something simple like a hiccup while I was
> flashing
> the  new firmware, so I'm interested if anyone else finds the same things
> I'm
> finding in the behavior.
>
> Ron  N6IE
> www.N6IE.com
>
> -----  Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gene Henderson"  <wb9hla@comcast.net>
> To: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>;  "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
> <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent:  Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A:  Not Ready for Prime Time!
>
>
>> Ron,
>> Looks like someone  forgot to install this on a radio and see if it
> worked.
>> I agree with  you
>> not even close to Prime Time
>> Gene WB9HLA
>>
>>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Ron Castro"  <ronc@sonic.net>
>> To: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>;  "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
>>  <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010  21:50
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime  Time!
>>
>>
>>> Addendum to my post:  on problem #1,  I'm referring to the RX audio.  TX
>>> audio (other than more  drive needed and processor problem) still sounds
>>> broadcast  quality.
>>>
>>>             Ron   N6IE
>>>        www.N6IE.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>  From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
>>> To:  <tentec@contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 6:41  PM
>>> Subject: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime  Time!
>>>
>>>
>>>> Here are a list of problems I  found right off with the v. 2.042A, even
>>>> after doing a battery  reset and two master resets and memory clear:
>>>>  1.. Very  noticeable distortion on all audio.  Sounds like overdrive
> in
>>>> IF
>>>> or DSP section.
>>>>   2.. AGC hang in AF AGC.  S-meter goes up and never comes down!  At
> same
>>>> time, RF gain goes down and does not come back up.   If you manually
> turn
>>>> the RF Gain all the way to 0, then back  up to 100, the radio is
>>>> essentially muted.  This will not  happen if the "AGC Hang" setting is
> 0,
>>>> but then distortion is  really bad.
>>>>  3.. NR does not work in AF AGC mode.   Does seem to work well in RF 
>>>> AGC
>>>> mode.
>>>>   4.. Much more audio drive needed on AUX input for SSB.  It looks 
>>>> like
>>>> about 10 dB more.
>>>>  5.. AM carrier=  1.25 Watts max!  That's at 100% PWR setting.
>>>>  6.. FM  carrier= 6.4 Watts max.
>>>>  7.. SSB Speech Processor gives  only around 50 Watts max peak output.
>>>> You
>>>> can  get it up to 100 Watts when you crank it to "way beyond 
>>>> reasonable
>>>> distortion".
>>>>  8.. Could not  find any sort of S-Meter calibration
>>>> Here are the good points  so far:
>>>>  1.. Side tone is louder and spot level is  too.
>>>>  2.. Waterfall display is much  improved.
>>>>  3.. Difference in frequency between Main and  Sub improved, but still
>>>> not
>>>> "phase  locked".  I detect about 0.1 Hz differential which should make
> it
>>>> fine for true diversity antenna work.
>>>>   4.. In RF AGC mode, the NR really does seem improved, although it's
>>>> hard
>>>> to tell with the audio distortion  mentioned above.
>>>> So that's the good, the bad and the ugly of  it!  I'm QSYing back to v.
>>>> 2.039d, the last one that  worked right...
>>>>
>>>>         Ron  N6IE
>>>>        www.N6IE.com
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing  list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing  list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing  list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing  list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>