They probably should have released this as a beta first. In fact, I wish TT
would return to the days when they had volunteer beta testers in the field
to give them valuable feed-back.
Ron N6IE
www.N6IE.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>
To: "'Ron Castro'" <ronc@sonic.net>; "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'"
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:42 AM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!
> It sounds like TenTec has someone "new" working with the software and who
> doesn't have a firm grasp of what is going on. It is definitely hard to
> understand why they released something with so many defects.
>
> There is obviously a lot of interaction between many of the functions so
> whoever is doing the programming would need to have a real good
> understanding of how the radio works. They would also need to be able to
> turn the radio on and use it. Based on user reports, it doesn't sound
> like
> this is the case.
>
> All-in-all, it is a baffling situation. It has to make everyone wonder
> about TenTec's commitment to the O and O-II.
>
> If the code and appropriate notes were released into the public domain
> then
> maybe some of the users could do a better job.
>
>
> ------------------ Wes Attaway (N5WA) ------------------
> 1138 Waters Edge Circle - Shreveport, LA 71106
> 318-797-4972 (office) - 318-393-3289 (cell)
> Computer Consulting and Forensics
> -------------- EnCase Certified Examiner ---------------
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Ron Castro
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:50 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!
>
> I'm glad we're only test piloting software and not airplanes, or I'd be a
> goner for sure!
>
> Ron Castro
> Chief Technical Officer
> Results Radio, LLC
> N6IE
> www.N6IE.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Rsoifer@aol.com>
> To: <ronc@sonic.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!
>
>
>> Ron and others,
>>
>> Many thanks for your fine work. After playing with 2.042A overnight,
>> I've
>> re-installed 2.041XT and will await T-T's next try.
>>
>> 73 Ray W2RS
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 4/14/2010 2:45:00 A.M. GMT Standard Time,
>> ronc@sonic.net
>> writes:
>>
>> I keep hoping that it's something simple like a hiccup while I was
>> flashing
>> the new firmware, so I'm interested if anyone else finds the same things
>> I'm
>> finding in the behavior.
>>
>> Ron N6IE
>> www.N6IE.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Gene Henderson" <wb9hla@comcast.net>
>> To: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
>> <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!
>>
>>
>>> Ron,
>>> Looks like someone forgot to install this on a radio and see if it
>> worked.
>>> I agree with you
>>> not even close to Prime Time
>>> Gene WB9HLA
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
>>> To: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
>>> <tentec@contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 21:50
>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!
>>>
>>>
>>>> Addendum to my post: on problem #1, I'm referring to the RX audio.
>>>> TX
>>>> audio (other than more drive needed and processor problem) still
>>>> sounds
>>>> broadcast quality.
>>>>
>>>> Ron N6IE
>>>> www.N6IE.com
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
>>>> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 6:41 PM
>>>> Subject: [TenTec] Orion II v 2.042A: Not Ready for Prime Time!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Here are a list of problems I found right off with the v. 2.042A,
>>>>> even
>>>>> after doing a battery reset and two master resets and memory clear:
>>>>> 1.. Very noticeable distortion on all audio. Sounds like overdrive
>> in
>>>>> IF
>>>>> or DSP section.
>>>>> 2.. AGC hang in AF AGC. S-meter goes up and never comes down! At
>> same
>>>>> time, RF gain goes down and does not come back up. If you manually
>> turn
>>>>> the RF Gain all the way to 0, then back up to 100, the radio is
>>>>> essentially muted. This will not happen if the "AGC Hang" setting is
>> 0,
>>>>> but then distortion is really bad.
>>>>> 3.. NR does not work in AF AGC mode. Does seem to work well in RF
>>>>> AGC
>>>>> mode.
>>>>> 4.. Much more audio drive needed on AUX input for SSB. It looks
>>>>> like
>>>>> about 10 dB more.
>>>>> 5.. AM carrier= 1.25 Watts max! That's at 100% PWR setting.
>>>>> 6.. FM carrier= 6.4 Watts max.
>>>>> 7.. SSB Speech Processor gives only around 50 Watts max peak output.
>>>>> You
>>>>> can get it up to 100 Watts when you crank it to "way beyond
>>>>> reasonable
>>>>> distortion".
>>>>> 8.. Could not find any sort of S-Meter calibration
>>>>> Here are the good points so far:
>>>>> 1.. Side tone is louder and spot level is too.
>>>>> 2.. Waterfall display is much improved.
>>>>> 3.. Difference in frequency between Main and Sub improved, but still
>>>>> not
>>>>> "phase locked". I detect about 0.1 Hz differential which should make
>> it
>>>>> fine for true diversity antenna work.
>>>>> 4.. In RF AGC mode, the NR really does seem improved, although it's
>>>>> hard
>>>>> to tell with the audio distortion mentioned above.
>>>>> So that's the good, the bad and the ugly of it! I'm QSYing back to
>>>>> v.
>>>>> 2.039d, the last one that worked right...
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron N6IE
>>>>> www.N6IE.com
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|